linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] mm: delete oversized WARN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74508663-8c2d-5c83-147f-adad7b71d93b@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:53:49 +0800
From:   Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@...wei.com>
To:     Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@...ux.alibaba.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <leon@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <w@....eu>,
        <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm: delete oversized WARN_ON() in kvmalloc() calls

On 2021/12/2 10:06, Bixuan Cui wrote:
> Delete the WARN_ON() and return NULL directly for oversized parameter
> in kvmalloc() calls.
> Also add unlikely().
> 

The commit message should explain why we need to do this. Thanks.

> Fixes: 7661809d493b ("mm: don't allow oversized kvmalloc() calls")
> Signed-off-by: Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> There are a lot of oversize warnings and patches about kvmalloc() calls
> recently. Maybe these warnings are not very necessary.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/YadOjJXMTjP85MQx@unreal
> 
> The example of size check in __do_kmalloc_node():
> __do_kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node, unsigned long caller)
> {
>         struct kmem_cache *cachep;
>         void *ret;
> 
>         if (unlikely(size > KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE))
>                 return NULL;
>         cachep = kmalloc_slab(size, flags);
> 
>  mm/util.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 7e433690..d26f19c 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ void *kvmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	/* Don't even allow crazy sizes */
> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > INT_MAX))
> +	if (unlikely(size > INT_MAX))
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, flags, node,
> 

Tang