[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWaW2Bv4Q7LPkVDeYngRWoTMztzUHZEvpLWbDkn9epH_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 11:04:16 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Heng Sia <jee.heng.sia@...el.com>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: dma: snps,dw-axi-dmac: Group tuples in snps properties
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 11:44 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 04:19:18PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > To improve human readability and enable automatic validation, the tuples
> > in "snps,block-size" and "snps,priority" properties should be grouped
> > using angle brackets.
>
> For these, the tools should allow either way. Where are you seeing an
> error?
Good to know. I'm not seeing any errors.
> I tried to rationalize which way should be 'correct' and gave up. I
> think bracketing only makes sense for matrix and phandle+arg cases.
That makes sense. And "interrupts" is special, because it's really a
short-hand for "interrupts-extended", with the phandle specified by
"interrupt-parent" at the same or a higher level.
Hence I'll drop this patch.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists