linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: Get rid of duplicate of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:40:55 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>,
        Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..." 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-unisoc@...ts.infradead.org,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
        Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment in
 the drivers

On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> GPIO library does copy the of_node from the parent device of
> the GPIO chip, there is no need to repeat this in the individual
> drivers. Remove these assignment all at once.
>
> For the details one may look into the of_gpio_dev_init() implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---

I have a bad feeling about this but I've gone through the drivers in
this patch and it seems like you don't update any of the drivers that
use multiple child OF nodes so I can't really point out any obvious
bug.

I have another change I'm working on that's related, let me send it shortly.

Bart