linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch 0/5] Support BCLK input clock in tlv320aic31xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Dec 2021 17:34:23 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com,
        festevam@...il.com, nicoleotsuka@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz,
        kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, michael@...rulasolutions.com,
        shengjiu.wang@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com,
        bkylerussell@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/5] Support BCLK input clock in tlv320aic31xx

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:25:17PM -0300, Ariel D'Alessandro wrote:
> On 11/22/21 9:00 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> > should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> > patches will not be replaced.

> I gotta send a fix for one of the patches. So, should it be a new
> incremental patch or I can still send a patchset v2?

See above.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)