[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9148a579-2843-96f8-9b64-a3adb8fcb411@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:35:47 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, hpa@...or.com,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix PAGE_KERNEL_IO removal breakage
On 12/2/21 4:25 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> About the first patch,
> 6b2a2138cf36 ("drm/i915/gem: Stop using PAGE_KERNEL_IO"),
> I didn't notice any regression on the i915
> side though. Is it safe to keep it? Otherwise we are probably better
> off reverting everything.
I'm just going to drop both of those for now:
27dff0f58bde ("x86/mm: Nuke PAGE_KERNEL_IO")
6b2a2138cf36 ("drm/i915/gem: Stop using PAGE_KERNEL_IO")
If you work out a fix, please integrate the patch from Joerg and resubmit.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists