[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1de01778-5750-c7aa-eac9-d9f91ad76ddb@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 17:26:13 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: "kyrie.wu" <kyrie.wu@...iatek.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...omium.org>
Cc: Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, xia.jiang@...iatek.com,
maoguang.meng@...iatek.com, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
irui.wang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1, 4/6] media: mtk-jpegdec: add jpeg decode worker
interface
Il 03/12/21 06:34, kyrie.wu ha scritto:
> Add jpeg decoding worker to ensure that three HWs
> run in parallel in MT8195.
>
> Signed-off-by: kyrie.wu <kyrie.wu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/mtk-jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c | 190 +++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/media/platform/mtk-jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.h | 5 +
> drivers/media/platform/mtk-jpeg/mtk_jpeg_dec_hw.c | 17 ++
> 3 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
Hello Kyrie,
thanks for the patch! However, there are some things to improve...
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> index f2a5e84..2518660 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> @@ -1065,57 +1065,187 @@ static void mtk_jpeg_enc_device_run(void *priv)
> queue_work(jpeg->workqueue, &ctx->jpeg_work);
> }
>
> -static void mtk_jpeg_dec_device_run(void *priv)
> +static int mtk_jpegdec_select_hw(struct mtk_jpeg_ctx *ctx)
> {
> - struct mtk_jpeg_ctx *ctx = priv;
> + struct mtk_jpegdec_comp_dev *comp_jpeg;
> struct mtk_jpeg_dev *jpeg = ctx->jpeg;
> - struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *src_buf, *dst_buf;
> - enum vb2_buffer_state buf_state = VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR;
> unsigned long flags;
> - struct mtk_jpeg_src_buf *jpeg_src_buf;
> + int hw_id = -1;
> + int i;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&jpeg->hw_lock, flags);
> + for (i = 0; i < MTK_JPEGDEC_HW_MAX; i++) {
> + comp_jpeg = jpeg->dec_hw_dev[i];
> + if (comp_jpeg->hw_state == MTK_JPEG_HW_IDLE) {
> + hw_id = i;
> + comp_jpeg->hw_state = MTK_JPEG_HW_BUSY;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&jpeg->hw_lock, flags);
> +
> + return hw_id;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_jpegdec_deselect_hw(struct mtk_jpeg_dev *jpeg, int hw_id)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&jpeg->hw_lock, flags);
> + jpeg->dec_hw_dev[hw_id]->hw_state =
> + MTK_JPEG_HW_IDLE;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&jpeg->hw_lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_jpegdec_set_hw_param(struct mtk_jpeg_ctx *ctx,
> + int hw_id,
> + struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *src_buf,
> + struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *dst_buf)
> +{
> + struct mtk_jpegdec_comp_dev *jpeg =
> + ctx->jpeg->dec_hw_dev[hw_id];
> +
> + jpeg->hw_param.curr_ctx = ctx;
> + jpeg->hw_param.src_buffer = src_buf;
> + jpeg->hw_param.dst_buffer = dst_buf;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_jpegdec_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct mtk_jpeg_ctx *ctx = container_of(work, struct mtk_jpeg_ctx,
> + jpeg_work);
> + struct mtk_jpegdec_comp_dev *comp_jpeg[MTK_JPEGDEC_HW_MAX];
> + enum vb2_buffer_state buf_state = VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR;
> + struct mtk_jpeg_src_buf *jpeg_src_buf, *jpeg_dst_buf;
> + struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *src_buf, *dst_buf;
> + struct mtk_jpeg_dev *jpeg = ctx->jpeg;
> + atomic_t *hw_rdy[MTK_JPEGDEC_HW_MAX];
> + struct clk *jpegdec_clk;
> + int ret, i, hw_id = 0;
> struct mtk_jpeg_bs bs;
> struct mtk_jpeg_fb fb;
> - int ret;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MTK_JPEGDEC_HW_MAX; i++) {
> + comp_jpeg[i] = jpeg->dec_hw_dev[i];
> + hw_rdy[i] = &comp_jpeg[i]->hw_rdy;
> + }
> +
This entire retry_select block should go to a helper function instead
of being inside of here.
Also, there's a big issue with this snippet that has to be solved: you're
unconditionally calling "goto retry_select" at the end of the if branch,
but please consider the following scenario:
- mtk_jpegdec_select_hw() returns a hw_id < 0
- wait_event_interruptible returns 0
... then we redo the same, and we still get the same result.
This may generate an infinite loop!!
After putting this into a separate function, please use a controlled loop
with a well thought maximum number of retries, as to avoid this situation.
> +retry_select:
> + hw_id = mtk_jpegdec_select_hw(ctx);
> + if (hw_id < 0) {
> + ret = wait_event_interruptible(jpeg->dec_hw_wq,
> + (atomic_read(hw_rdy[0]) ||
> + atomic_read(hw_rdy[1]) ||
> + atomic_read(hw_rdy[2])) > 0);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + dev_err(jpeg->dev, "%s : %d, all HW are busy\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
> + v4l2_m2m_job_finish(jpeg->m2m_dev, ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + dev_err(jpeg->dev, "%s : %d, NEW HW IDLE, please retry selcet!!!\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
> + goto retry_select;
> + }
>
> + atomic_dec(&comp_jpeg[hw_id]->hw_rdy);
> src_buf = v4l2_m2m_next_src_buf(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> + if (!src_buf) {
> + dev_err(jpeg->dev, "%s : %d, get src_buf fail !!!\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
> + goto getbuf_fail;
> + }
> dst_buf = v4l2_m2m_next_dst_buf(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> + if (!dst_buf) {
> + dev_err(jpeg->dev, "%s : %d, get dst_buf fail !!!\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
> + goto getbuf_fail;
> + }
> +
> jpeg_src_buf = mtk_jpeg_vb2_to_srcbuf(&src_buf->vb2_buf);
> + jpeg_dst_buf = mtk_jpeg_vb2_to_srcbuf(&dst_buf->vb2_buf);
>
> - if (mtk_jpeg_check_resolution_change(ctx, &jpeg_src_buf->dec_param)) {
> + if (mtk_jpeg_check_resolution_change(ctx,
> + &jpeg_src_buf->dec_param)) {
Why are you breaking this line? There's no need to.
> mtk_jpeg_queue_src_chg_event(ctx);
> ctx->state = MTK_JPEG_SOURCE_CHANGE;
> - v4l2_m2m_job_finish(jpeg->m2m_dev, ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> - return;
> + goto getbuf_fail;
> }
>
Regards,
- Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists