lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66151f3a-0e32-fc57-cb54-5b714588389b@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 13:30:57 -0800
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC:     <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        <bp@...en8.de>, <luto@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        <kai.huang@...el.com>, <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
        <cedric.xing@...el.com>, <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
        <mark.shanahan@...el.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/25] x86/sgx: Move PTE zap code to separate function

Hi Jarkko,

On 12/4/2021 2:59 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:23:05AM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> The SGX reclaimer removes page table entries pointing to pages that are
>> moved to swap. SGX2 enables changes to pages belonging to an initialized
>> enclave, for example changing page permissions. Supporting SGX2 requires
>> this ability to remove page table entries that is available in the
>> SGX reclaimer code.
> 
> Missing: why SGX2 requirest this?

The above paragraph states that SGX2 needs to remove page table entries 
because it modifies page permissions. Could you please elaborate what is 
missing?

> 
>> Factor out the code removing page table entries to a separate function,
>> fixing accuracy of comments in the process, and make it available to other
>> areas within the SGX code.
>>
>> Since the code will no longer be unique to the reclaimer it is relocated
>> to be with the rest of the enclave code in encl.c interacting with the
>> page table.
> 
> This last paragraph should be removed. It can be seen from the code change
> and diffstat.

I understand that the code movement can be seen from the diffstat but 
the reason for the move may not be obvious to everybody. If it is ok 
with you I'd rather keep this text.

Reinette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ