linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Drop binary value handling for buffered clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ya6QgJ9kDuSReZGC@ripper>
Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:36:48 -0800
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Drop binary value handling for
 buffered clock

On Mon 06 Dec 14:21 PST 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-12-06 07:26:44)
> > On Sat 30 Oct 21:07 CDT 2021, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > 
> > > The buffered clock binary value handling added by commit 36354c32bd76
> > > ("clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Add .recalc_rate hook for clk_smd_rpm_branch_ops")
> > > is redundant, because buffered clock is branch type, and the binary
> > > value handling for branch clock has been handled by
> > > clk_smd_rpm_prepare/unprepare functions.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> 
> Does that mean you picked it up? Or you want me to pick it up?

It meant that I reviewed the patch, but as it's not a regression I then
went on to pick it up for clk-next - there should be a "thank you" from
a few minutes ago.

I'll ensure to include a note for you in the future when it could go in
either branch.

Regards,
Bjorn