[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211206224256.84491C341CA@smtp.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 14:42:55 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Drop binary value handling for buffered clock
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-12-06 14:36:48)
> On Mon 06 Dec 14:21 PST 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-12-06 07:26:44)
> > > On Sat 30 Oct 21:07 CDT 2021, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > >
> > > > The buffered clock binary value handling added by commit 36354c32bd76
> > > > ("clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Add .recalc_rate hook for clk_smd_rpm_branch_ops")
> > > > is redundant, because buffered clock is branch type, and the binary
> > > > value handling for branch clock has been handled by
> > > > clk_smd_rpm_prepare/unprepare functions.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> >
> > Does that mean you picked it up? Or you want me to pick it up?
>
> It meant that I reviewed the patch, but as it's not a regression I then
> went on to pick it up for clk-next - there should be a "thank you" from
> a few minutes ago.
>
> I'll ensure to include a note for you in the future when it could go in
> either branch.
>
Ok, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists