linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH RFT 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:33:07 +0530
From:   Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ming.lei@...hat.com, hare@...e.de
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFT 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for
 shared tags

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Garry [mailto:john.garry@...wei.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:28 PM
> To: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>; axboe@...nel.dk
> Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> ming.lei@...hat.com; hare@...e.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter()
> for shared tags
>
> On 26/11/2021 11:51, John Garry wrote:
> >> This patch set improves above call trace even after disk_util=0 is set.
> > ok, fine. Thanks for testing.
> >
> > So I guess that this is a regression, and you would want this series
> > for v5.16, right? My changes were made with v5.17 in mind.
> >
> > I am not sure how Jens feels about it, since the changes are
> > significant. It would be a lot easier to argue for v5.16 if we got to
> > this point earlier in the cycle...
> >
>
> note: I will now resend for 5.17 and add your tested-by, please let me
> know if
> unhappy about that.

John - 5.17 should be OK. I am doing additional testing and so far no issue.

Tested-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>

>
> > Anyway, it would be good to have full review first, so please help
> > with that.
> >
> > @Ming, can you please give feedback on 3/3 here?
>
> Thanks and also to Hannes for the reviews.
>
> john

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4212 bytes)