[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211207160203.30206456@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 16:02:03 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
stable-rt@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...e.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>, carnil@...ian.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58
On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:56:28 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2021-12-07 15:20:49 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:17:12 +0100
> > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.
> > > …
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz
> > >
> > > Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject line?
> >
> > I'm guessing because he just took over 5.10-rt and did not update his
> > scripts ;-)
>
> It seems to confuse ppl. Is there a reason to have it?
>
It shouldn't. The point I'm making is that this is Luis's first release of
5.10-rt, and it sounds like it had some issues.
Luis, you may want to see what happened and fix it.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists