linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Dec 2021 10:14:41 -0300
From:   Luis Goncalves <lgoncalv@...hat.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable-rt@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...e.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>, carnil@...ian.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.83-rt58

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:02 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:56:28 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On 2021-12-07 15:20:49 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:17:12 +0100
> > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > > > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release.
> > > > …
> > > > >   https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz
> > > >
> > > > Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject line?
> > >
> > > I'm guessing because he just took over 5.10-rt and did not update his
> > > scripts ;-)
> >
> > It seems to confuse ppl. Is there a reason to have it?
> >
>
> It shouldn't. The point I'm making is that this is Luis's first release of
> 5.10-rt, and it sounds like it had some issues.
>
> Luis, you may want to see what happened and fix it.

Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing
the code and missed something that obvious.

Sorry for the confusion I caused.

Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch
subjects fixed?

Thanks for spotting that,
Luis

>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>