[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211207053142.d4xvkqs57zob2v2i@treble>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 21:31:42 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Bruce Schlobohm <bruce.schlobohm@...el.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@...tuozzo.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Marios Pomonis <pomonis@...gle.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/14] kallsyms: Hide layout
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 11:03:35AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 11:01, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 11:32:07PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > > From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > This patch makes /proc/kallsyms display in a random order, rather
> > > than sorted by address in order to hide the newly randomized address
> > > layout.
> >
> > Is there a reason to not always do this? That is, why are we keeping two
> > copies of this code around? Less code is more better etc..
>
> +1.
>
> IIRC I made the exact same point when this patch was sent out by
> Kristen a while ago.
Yes. Alexander, I'd recommend going back to the review comments from
Kristen's last posting, they may have been missed.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists