linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Drop incorrect unevaluatedProperties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d2b524c5-3e65-248d-44d2-eaf337cf4765@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 14:49:12 +0200
From:   Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Drop incorrect
 unevaluatedProperties



On 06/12/2021 19:42, Rob Herring wrote:
> With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, the TI GPMC example
> has a warning:
> 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-onenand.example.dt.yaml: memory-controller@...00000: onenand@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible', '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'partition@0', 'partition@...000' were unexpected)
> 
> The child node definition for GPMC is not a complete binding, so specifying
> 'unevaluatedProperties: false' for it is not correct and should be
> dropped.
> 
> Fixup the unnecessary 'allOf' while we're here.
> 
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Reviewed-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>

cheers,
-roger