linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Drop incorrect unevaluatedProperties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 09:54:36 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Drop incorrect unevaluatedProperties

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 3:12 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/12/2021 18:42, Rob Herring wrote:
> > With 'unevaluatedProperties' support implemented, the TI GPMC example
> > has a warning:
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ti,gpmc-onenand.example.dt.yaml: memory-controller@...00000: onenand@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible', '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'partition@0', 'partition@...000' were unexpected)
> >
> > The child node definition for GPMC is not a complete binding, so specifying
> > 'unevaluatedProperties: false' for it is not correct and should be
> > dropped.
> >
> > Fixup the unnecessary 'allOf' while we're here.
> >
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> > Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml      | 5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Looks good. Rob, do you want to take it via your tree or I should handle it?

I'll take it given there's also the somewhat related "dt-bindings:
mtd: ti,gpmc-nand: Add missing 'rb-gpios'"

Rob