linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] drm: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YbH1mBlbuysch15b@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Dec 2021 14:24:56 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] drm: Replace kernel.h with the necessary
 inclusions

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 01:35:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 05:39:33PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > Am 10.11.21 um 17:34 schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 3:55 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de> wrote:
> > > > > Am 10.11.21 um 11:24 schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > > > > +#include <linux/container_of.h>
> > > > > 
> > > > > I built this patch on a recent drm-misc-next, but there's no
> > > > > linux/container_of.h
> > > > 
> > > > Thank you for trying. It's in the upstream, whenever drm-misc-next
> > > > switches to newer/newest upstream it will be there. I assume it will
> > > > happen after v5.16-rc1?
> > > 
> > > Yes, we'll certainly backmerge soon after rc1 has been released. If I forget
> > > to add the patch then, please send a reminder.
> > > 
> > > Once the necessary headers are available,
> > 
> > $ git log --oneline v5.16-rc1 -- include/linux/container_of.h
> > e1edc277e6f6 linux/container_of.h: switch to static_assert
> > d2a8ebbf8192 kernel.h: split out container_of() and typeof_member() macros
> > 
> > > the patch is
> > > Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
> > 
> > Thanks!
> 
> Maybe I misunderstood something, I thought that DRM people may apply this,
> is it incorrect assumption?

It still does not appear in Linux Next...
What should I do to move this forward, please?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko