linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kunit: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YbH1+gYYh3/s+KAp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Dec 2021 14:26:34 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kunit: Replace kernel.h with the necessary
 inclusions

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:35:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When kernel.h is used in the headers it adds a lot into dependency hell,
> especially when there are circular dependencies are involved.
> 
> Replace kernel.h inclusion with the list of what is really being used.

Folks, this patch is dated month ago and nothing in return.

Does the Kunit subsystem abandoned / orphaned? Should I send and update
to MAINTAINERS? Should I escalate this?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko