linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Documentation: dev-tools: Add KTAP specification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41323fe3-3f73-4681-7d75-2301f9982a25@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:11:39 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, Tim.Bird@...y.com,
        shuah@...nel.org, rmr167@...il.com, guillaume.tucker@...labora.com,
        dlatypov@...gle.com, kernelci@...ups.io,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Documentation: dev-tools: Add KTAP specification

On 12/10/21 2:05 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
>> On 12/7/21 3:02 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 11:02:51AM -0800, David Gow wrote:
>>>> From: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
>>>>
>>>> It does not make any significant additions or changes other than those
>>>> already in use in the kernel: additional features can be added as they
>>>> become necessary and used.
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
>>>> Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
>>>
>>> I like it! Thank you so much for suffering through my earlier reviews.
>>> :)
>>>
>>> The only concern I have is wonder what'll be needed to kselftest to
>>> deal with indentation changes. As long as this can be implemented
>>> without a subtest knowing it is a subtest, we're good.
>>>
>>
>> A lot of this TAP output is in the wrappers - hopefully it will be okay.
>> Fingers crossed. :)
>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>
>>
>> Looks good to me as well. Thanks for doing this work.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> Would you like me to take this through the docs tree, or do you have
> other plans for merging?
> 

Please take this through docs.

thanks,
-- Shuah