lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:13:56 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc:     arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
        Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/9] arm64: imx8mn: Enable more imx8m Nano functions

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:03:06PM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:19 AM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The i.MX8M Nano is similar to the i.MX8M Mini in some ways, but very
> > different in others.  With the blk-ctrl driver for Mini in place,
> > this series expands the blk-ctrl driver to support the Nano which
> > opens the door for additional functions in the future.  As part of
> > this series, it also addresses some issues in the GPCv2 driver and
> > finally adds support for enabling USB and GPU.
> >
> > V4:  Rebase on top of [1] which fixes hangs caused from CSI and DSI reset
> >      and add the same fixes for CSI and DSI to the Nano
> > V3:  Fixes an the yaml example
> > V2:  Fixes the clock count in the blk-ctrl
> >
> > [1] - https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg936266.html
> >
> 
> Shawn,
> 
> This series should apply cleanly against your tree now that [1] has
> been applied to your tree.  Should I submit this a resend or are you
> able to test the build now?

I haven't seen any comments on this series from Lucas.

Shawn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ