linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] perf/marvell: cn10k DDR perf event core ownership

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:25:08 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, bbudiredla@...vell.com,
        sgoutham@...vell.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] perf/marvell: cn10k DDR perf event core ownership

On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 05:26:43PM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> As DDR perf event counters are not per core, so they should be accessed
> only by one core at a time. Select new core when previously owning core
> is going offline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>
> ---
> v1->v6
>  - No Change
> 
>  drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/cpuhotplug.h           |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

I don't think the driver is much use without this patch, so please can you
move the Kconfig stuff to a patch at the end so that the driver can't be
enabled in a broken state half way through the series?

Will