[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211214090148.264f4660@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:01:48 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"live-patching@...r.kernel.org" <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Implement livepatch on PPC32
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:35:14 +0100
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:
> > Will continue investigating.
> >
>
> trace_selftest_startup_function_graph() calls register_ftrace_direct()
> which returns -ENOSUPP because powerpc doesn't select
> CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS.
>
> Should TEST_DIRECT_TRAMP depend on CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS ?
Yes, that should be:
#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE) && \
defined(CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS)
#define TEST_DIRECT_TRAMP
noinline __noclone static void trace_direct_tramp(void) { }
#endif
And make it test it with or without the args.
Thanks for finding this.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists