linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] acpi: Store _PLD information and convert users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gFVQanDYwLFe6GFo2uYOHurrXka2c64n_4rvzPPts-MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:56:25 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SUBSYSTEM:" 
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] acpi: Store _PLD information and convert users

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:32 AM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm now using the helpers device_match_acpi_dev() and
> device_match_fwnode() like Andy suggested. No other changes.
>
>
> The original cover letter:
>
> This removes the need for the drivers to always separately evaluate
> the _PLD. With the USB Type-C connector and USB port mapping this
> allows us to start using the component framework and remove the custom
> APIs.
>
> So far the only users of the _PLD information have been the USB
> drivers, but it seems it will be used also at least in some camera
> drivers later. These nevertheless touch mostly USB drivers.
>
> Rafael, is it still OK if Greg takes these?

It is in general, but let me look at the changes in scan.c in particular.