linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] lib: TEST_REF_TRACKER should depend on REF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89i+rBQr0dCKp6KrO83cFmB-abNSSbxJiDmOVf-gFfiKnwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:57:23 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] lib: TEST_REF_TRACKER should depend on REF_TRACKER
 instead of selecting it

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:55 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>

> So you say that STACKDEPOT should be user selectable,
> even if no layer is using it ?
>
> I based my work on STACKDEPOT, not on EXT4

In any case, the patch you sent prevents me from testing the module alone.

So whatever you had in mind, you will have to send another patch.