[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YbsrwkfDb19cnHXT@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 13:06:26 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] LICENSES/LGPL-2.1: Add LGPL-2.1-or-later as valid
identifiers
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:33:33PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Some files have been flagged with the new LGPL-2.1-or-later
> identifier which replace the original LGPL-2.1+ in the SPDX license
> identifier specification, but the identifiers are not mentioned as
> valid in the LGPL-2.1 license file.
>
> Add it, together with the LGPL-2.1-only at the the license file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> ---
> LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 b/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1
> index 27bb4342a3e8..5feb8a6dbf15 100644
> --- a/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1
> +++ b/LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1
> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1
> Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+
> +Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-only
> +Valid-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later
Can you sort it like we did in the GPL-2.0 file instead which clumps it
by functionality, not in alphabetical order?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists