[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ad0b0e7-1c09-b7eb-87a3-e62e9e3d12af@canonical.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 11:50:50 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: exynos850: Add bindings for
Exynos850 sysreg clocks
On 14/12/2021 17:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/12/2021 17:15, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 at 22:54, Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 02:12, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 22:36:40 +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>>>> System Register is used to configure system behavior, like USI protocol,
>>>>> etc. SYSREG clocks should be provided to corresponding syscon nodes, to
>>>>> make it possible to modify SYSREG registers.
>>>>>
>>>>> While at it, add also missing PMU and GPIO clocks, which looks necessary
>>>>> and might be needed for corresponding Exynos850 features soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos850.h | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>>
>>> Hi Sylwester,
>>>
>>> Can you please review and apply this series, if it's ok?
>>>
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> Do you think it's possible to take this series in your tree? Once it's
>> applied, I can send the board support (dts) series -- this is the only
>> remaining blocker for that right now.
>
> I would need an Ack from Sylwester anyway. If you have dependencies (the
> DTS), you should send them together with it. Once Sylwester applies this
> patch, the DTS either waits till next release or it has to be modified
> to not depend on this patch.
Sylwester,
We need decision from your side. The apply-window is slowly closing, so
at least take it so DTSI will be free to go next cycle.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists