[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71c5ca50-1bf9-4ef7-eea0-634f66838d4a@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:09:20 -0500
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rtmutex: Fix incorrect spinning condition
On 12/17/21 02:42, Zqiang wrote:
> When the lock owner is on CPU and not need resched, the current waiter
> need to be checked, if it not longer top the waiter, stop spinning.
Incorrect grammar, should be "if it is no longer the top waiter". There
is a similar typo in the existing code comment too.
You can modify the subject line to [PATCH-tip ...] to indicate that it
is supposed to be apply on top of the tip tree. Other than that, the
patch looks good.
Cheers,
Longman
>
> Fixes: c3123c431447 ("locking/rtmutex: Dont dereference waiter lockless")
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> Modify description information.
>
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> index 0c1f2e3f019a..8555c4efe97c 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
> * - the VCPU on which owner runs is preempted
> */
> if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched() ||
> - rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) {
> + !rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) {
> res = false;
> break;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists