linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 3/7] dt-bindings: arm: samsung: document jackpotlte board binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b5ff4ca4-30fe-200b-77ee-1f1831329a99@canonical.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:38:42 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 3/7] dt-bindings: arm: samsung: document
 jackpotlte board binding

On 19/12/2021 15:53, David Virag wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 17:21 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 16:31:17 +0100, David Virag wrote:
>>> Add binding for the jackpotlte board (Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)).
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> [3/7] dt-bindings: arm: samsung: document jackpotlte board binding
>>       commit: c96ebc5fde274edcc02543dcfb6a1ee097f98070
>>
>> Best regards,
> 
> Hi Krzysztof!
> 
> Thanks! As I'll be sending v5 of this series soon (only really adding
> r-by, acked-by tags and only real changes in dts/dtsi patch), should I
> omit this patch from it since it has been applied? Or should I really
> only send the dts/dtsi patch at this point? Sorry if this is obvious, I
> just haven't sent that many patches before to know this.

Skip this one, please.


Best regards,
Krzysztof