[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b49ffb8c-8784-978b-faf5-6fe1ace37c9e@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:40:41 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: Add bindings definitions for
Exynos7885 CMU
On 12/12/2021 19:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/12/2021 16:31, David Virag wrote:
>> Just like on Exynos850, the clock controller driver is designed to have
>> separate instances for each particular CMU, so clock IDs start from 1
>> for each CMU in this bindings header too.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Added R-b tag by Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Nothing
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Nothing
>>
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos7885.h | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos7885.h
>>
>
> Hi Sylwester,
>
> The DTS/DTSI patch (7/7) depends on this one, just like the clock driver.
>
> Since some time Arnd and Olof prefer not to have external trees going
> into the arm-soc, even if this is only the header change. They recommend
> one of:
> 1. to hard-code the numbers in DTS and replace numbers->macros later,
> 2. merge headers to arm-soc tree with DTS and provide the header to an
> external (e.g. clk) tree,
> 3. wait with merging DTSI till headers reach mainline.
>
> I propose that I take the clock headers, put on separate branch and
> provide them to you as stable tag. You can base clk driver changes on
> top of it.
>
> Are you okay with this?
Hi Sylwester,
I see you applied the patches, so I understand we are not going with
this proposal.
David,
Your DTSI and DTS will have to either wait for next cycle or please
resend with clock macros replaced with numbers + TODO note.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists