[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <daa01574-5d7b-c125-48a9-d1ec7bd1fb64@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:26:23 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valentin.schneider@....com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com,
qperret@...gle.com, lukasz.luba@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during migration
On 09.12.21 17:11, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
[...]
> @@ -6899,6 +6899,14 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)
>
> static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
>
> +static u64 rq_clock_pelt_estimator(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + u64 pelt_lag = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) -
> + u64_u32_load(rq->clock_pelt_lag);
> +
> + return cfs_rq_last_update_time(&rq->cfs) + pelt_lag;
Why do you use `avg.last_update_time` (lut) of the root cfs_rq here?
p's lut was just synced to cfs_rq_of(se)'s lut in
migrate_task_rq_fair() (1) -> remove_entity_load_avg() ->
sync_entity_load_avg(se) (2)
[...]
> @@ -6924,26 +6934,29 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
> * In case of TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING we in fact hold the 'old'
> * rq->lock and can modify state directly.
> */
> - lockdep_assert_rq_held(task_rq(p));
> - detach_entity_cfs_rq(&p->se);
> + lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> + detach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
>
> } else {
> + remove_entity_load_avg(se);
> +
> /*
> - * We are supposed to update the task to "current" time, then
> - * its up to date and ready to go to new CPU/cfs_rq. But we
> - * have difficulty in getting what current time is, so simply
> - * throw away the out-of-date time. This will result in the
> - * wakee task is less decayed, but giving the wakee more load
> - * sounds not bad.
> + * Here, the task's PELT values have been updated according to
> + * the current rq's clock. But if that clock hasn't been
> + * updated in a while, a substantial idle time will be missed,
> + * leading to an inflation after wake-up on the new rq.
> + *
> + * Estimate the PELT clock lag, and update sched_avg to ensure
> + * PELT continuity after migration.
> */
> - remove_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
> + __update_load_avg_blocked_se(rq_clock_pelt_estimator(rq), se);
We do __update_load_avg_blocked_se() now twice for p, 1. in (2) and then
in (1) again.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists