linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: Support dynamic preemption v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211220140726.GB918551@lothringen>
Date:   Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:07:26 +0100
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: Support dynamic preemption v3

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 03:03:36PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hello Frederic,
> 
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 15:01, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I haven't seen much comments on the static key based version from Mark
> > so I don't know which direction we'll eventually take. I still hope we
> > can focus on a unified static call based implementation, considering
> > there are other users waiting on arm64 static calls.
> >
> 
> Which other users are you referring to here?

I believe Android was interested in it?