[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211221113706.329791-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:37:06 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <hch@....de>, <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] scsi: efct: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
Fixes: efac162a4e4d ("scsi: efct: Don't pass GFP_DMA to dma_alloc_coherent()")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c
index 7bb4f9aad2c8..7043a61d553d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ efc_els_io_alloc_size(struct efc_node *node, u32 reqlen, u32 rsplen)
/* now allocate DMA for request and response */
els->io.req.size = reqlen;
els->io.req.virt = dma_alloc_coherent(&efc->pci->dev, els->io.req.size,
- &els->io.req.phys, GFP_KERNEL);
+ &els->io.req.phys, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!els->io.req.virt) {
mempool_free(els, efc->els_io_pool);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&node->els_ios_lock, flags);
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ efc_els_io_alloc_size(struct efc_node *node, u32 reqlen, u32 rsplen)
els->io.rsp.size = rsplen;
els->io.rsp.virt = dma_alloc_coherent(&efc->pci->dev, els->io.rsp.size,
- &els->io.rsp.phys, GFP_KERNEL);
+ &els->io.rsp.phys, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!els->io.rsp.virt) {
dma_free_coherent(&efc->pci->dev, els->io.req.size,
els->io.req.virt, els->io.req.phys);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists