lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:29:04 +0100
From:   Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: Document "label" property

On 12/21/21 11:43 AM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> All iio devices can have a label, which will be carried on to userspace
> as a sysfs attribute. This is useful when having several iio devices
> that represent different instances of the same hardware, as the name
> attribute would then not be enough to differentiate between them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> ---
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/common.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/common.yaml
> index f845b41d74c4..a90ad7718ecf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/common.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/common.yaml
> @@ -32,6 +32,14 @@ properties:
>         considered 'near' to the device (an object is near to the
>         sensor).
>   
> +  label:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> +    description: |
> +      All iio devices can have a label, which will be carried on to userspace
> +      as a sysfs attribute. This is useful when having several iio devices that
> +      represent different instances of the same hardware, as the name attribute
> +      would then not be enough to differentiate between them.
> +

The description has a lot of implementation details of the Linux kernel. 
The devicetree bindings should be formulated operating system agnostic.

Something like:

A descriptive label that allows to uniquely identify the device within 
the system.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ