linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] bindings: spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: mark interrupt properties as optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab5727dc-1946-2fc3-f946-32a2b8a000c0@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:48:19 +0800
From:   Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <tglx@...utronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <maz@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] bindings: spmi: spmi-pmic-arb: mark interrupt
 properties as optional



On 2021/12/21 23:13, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:20:06 +0800, Fenglin Wu wrote:
>> From: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> Mark all interrupt related properties as optional instead of
>> required.  Some boards do not required PMIC IRQ support and it
>> isn't needed to handle SPMI bus transactions, so specify it as
>> optional.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb.txt | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 
I will remember to add the Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags next time when 
sending any update in this series. Thanks for the notice!