[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211222093626.GA13332@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 22:36:26 +1300
From: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, realwakka@...il.com,
paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex definition
Checkpatch reports: CHECK: struct mutex definition without comment.
Fix this by documenting what rx_mutex struct is used for in pi433 driver.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
index 29bd37669059..aa0ecb3788c6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct pi433_device {
u32 rx_bytes_to_drop;
u32 rx_bytes_dropped;
unsigned int rx_position;
+ /* rx read and config operations can only be served one at the time */
struct mutex rx_lock;
wait_queue_head_t rx_wait_queue;
--
2.25.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists