[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc0aWrFtNK1ZkHkwP62zNXQJaDcn9pc8Uhfq0kOnWzmJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:29:04 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 09/15] iio: afe: rescale: reduce risk of integer overflow
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:47 AM Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Liam Beguin <lvb@...hos.com>
>
> Reduce the risk of integer overflow by doing the scale calculation on
> a 64-bit integer. Since the rescaling is only performed on *val, reuse
> the IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2 case.
...
> - tmp = 1 << *val2;
At some point this should be BIT()
Rule of thumb (in accordance with C standard), always use unsigned
value as left operand of the _left_ shift.
> + if (scale_type == IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL)
> + tmp = *val2;
> + else
> + tmp = 1 << *val2;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists