[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7b8ed2f-7280-faf9-66e8-ad329dbc10f6@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:09:25 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
<kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Chen Zhou <dingguo.cz@...group.com>,
"John Donnelly" <John.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 01/17] x86/setup: Move CRASH_ALIGN and
CRASH_ADDR_{LOW|HIGH}_MAX to asm/kexec.h
On 2021/12/23 4:43, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:08:04PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
>>
>> We want to make function reserve_crashkernel[_low](), which is implemented
> ^^
>
> Please use passive voice in your commit message: no "we" or "I", etc,
> and describe your changes in imperative mood.
My bad language habits. I've made this mistake several times.
>
> Also, pls read section "2) Describe your changes" in
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more details.
>
> Bottom line is: personal pronouns are ambiguous in text, especially with
> so many parties/companies/etc developing the kernel so let's avoid them
> please.
OK, I'll check the description of the other patches.
>
>> by X86, available to other architectures. It references macro CRASH_ALIGN
>
> "x86"
OK
>
>> and will be moved to public crash_core.c. But the defined values of
>> CRASH_ALIGN may be different in different architectures. So moving the
>> definition of CRASH_ALIGN to asm/kexec.h is a good choice.
>>
>> The reason for moving CRASH_ADDR_{LOW|HIGH}_MAX is the same as above.
>
> This commit message needs to say something along the lines of:
>
> "Move CRASH_ALIGN and ... to the arch-specific header in preparation
> of making reserve_crashkernel[_low]() generic, used by other
> architectures."
OK, I will use this one, thanks.
By the way, patch 0004-0006 were written based on your suggestion. Can you
take a moment to review it? I think I forgot to add "Suggested-by".
>
> or so.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists