linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/13] riscv: Fixup difference with defconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJF2gTR4TXXWQ5Ubnz6HdoOmV=EkL9AsEH07RzmVypyeK353vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:12:37 +0800
From:   Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, Wei Fu <wefu@...hat.com>,
        Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
        Wang Junqiang <wangjunqiang@...as.ac.cn>,
        Wei Wu (吴伟) <lazyparser@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] riscv: Fixup difference with defconfig

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 9:52 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:06 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 8:51 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:34 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > Given that there are no specific rv32 SoC implementations supported
> > > by the kernel today (other than SOC_VIRT), the number of users
> > > would be close to zero anyway.
> > I really agree with you, but we still need the rv32 user mode
> > ecosystem for memory footprint.
>
> Sure, I just meant there are few users that would have to relearn typing
> "make defconfig 32-bit.config" instead of "make rv32_defconfig" even
> without the added Makefile target.
Emm... I got you.

Next version, I would send delete rv32_defconfig patch. If Palmer
object, I would change to make rv32_defconfig target. ;)

>
>          Arnd


-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/