[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d211abea-0a4f-d23e-45fa-319d7aebe52d@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 13:11:51 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <p.yadav@...com>, <michael@...le.cc>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mtd: spi-nor: spansion: write 2 bytes when
disabling Octal DTR mode
On 12/23/21 3:06 PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> On 5/31/21 9:17 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> The Octal DTR configuration is stored in the CFR5V register. This
>> register is 1 byte wide. But 1 byte long transactions are not allowed in
>> 8D-8D-8D mode. Since the next byte address does not contain any
>> register, it is safe to write any value to it. Write a 0 to it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
>> ---
>>
>> (no changes since v1)
>>
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c
>> index ee82dcd75310..e6bf5c9eee6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spansion.c
>> @@ -65,10 +65,18 @@ static int spi_nor_cypress_octal_dtr_enable(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - if (enable)
>> - *buf = SPINOR_REG_CYPRESS_CFR5V_OCT_DTR_EN;
>> - else
>> - *buf = SPINOR_REG_CYPRESS_CFR5V_OCT_DTR_DS;
>> + if (enable) {
>> + buf[0] = SPINOR_REG_CYPRESS_CFR5V_OCT_DTR_EN;
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * The register is 1-byte wide, but 1-byte transactions are not
>> + * allowed in 8D-8D-8D mode. Since there is no register at the
>> + * next location, just initialize the value to 0 and let the
>> + * transaction go on.
>> + */
>> + buf[0] = SPINOR_REG_CYPRESS_CFR5V_OCT_DTR_DS;
>> + buf[1] = 0;
>
> how about writing 0xff instead?
patches 1, 2 and 3 look fine, except for this comment. Would you resend them, or you want
me to do the change locally when applying? Send me an updated comment if so.
>
>> + }
>>
>> op = (struct spi_mem_op)
>> SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_WR_ANY_REG, 1),
>> @@ -76,7 +84,7 @@ static int spi_nor_cypress_octal_dtr_enable(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
>> SPINOR_REG_CYPRESS_CFR5V,
>> 1),
>> SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
>> - SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(1, buf, 1));
>> + SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(enable ? 1 : 2, buf, 1));
>>
>> if (!enable)
>> spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
>> --
>> 2.30.0
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists