lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 01:34:45 +0300
From:   Sergey Organov <sorganov@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Selecting MMU page size for an architecture 

Hello,

We are building custom CPU and have an option to choose either 4K or 16K
MMU minimum page size that will then be fixed in the hardware. For
reasons unrelated to the Linux kernel we'd prefer 16K, but I have some
doubts.

What pros and cons for kernel and user-space operation 16K pages will
have over more usual 4K pages? Anything we should worry about?

Thanks,
-- Sergey Organov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ