linux-kernel - [PATCH] clk: bm1880: remove kfrees on static allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:42:44 +0000
From:   <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <mani@...nel.org>, <Mmturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
        <mail@...chuod.ie>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: bm1880: remove kfrees on static allocations

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

bm1880_clk_unregister_pll & bm1880_clk_unregister_div both try to
free statically allocated variables, so remove those kfrees.

For example, if we take L703 kfree(div_hw):
- div_hw is a bm1880_div_hw_clock pointer
- in bm1880_clk_register_plls this is pointed to an element of arg1:
  struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *clks
- in the probe, where bm1880_clk_register_plls is called arg1 is
  bm1880_div_clks, defined on L371:
  static struct bm1880_div_hw_clock bm1880_div_clks[]

Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c | 20 ++------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c b/drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c
index e6d6599d310a..fad78a22218e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-bm1880.c
@@ -522,14 +522,6 @@ static struct clk_hw *bm1880_clk_register_pll(struct bm1880_pll_hw_clock *pll_cl
 	return hw;
 }
 
-static void bm1880_clk_unregister_pll(struct clk_hw *hw)
-{
-	struct bm1880_pll_hw_clock *pll_hw = to_bm1880_pll_clk(hw);
-
-	clk_hw_unregister(hw);
-	kfree(pll_hw);
-}
-
 static int bm1880_clk_register_plls(struct bm1880_pll_hw_clock *clks,
 				    int num_clks,
 				    struct bm1880_clock_data *data)
@@ -555,7 +547,7 @@ static int bm1880_clk_register_plls(struct bm1880_pll_hw_clock *clks,
 
 err_clk:
 	while (i--)
-		bm1880_clk_unregister_pll(data->hw_data.hws[clks[i].pll.id]);
+		clk_hw_unregister(data->hw_data.hws[clks[i].pll.id]);
 
 	return PTR_ERR(hw);
 }
@@ -695,14 +687,6 @@ static struct clk_hw *bm1880_clk_register_div(struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *div_cl
 	return hw;
 }
 
-static void bm1880_clk_unregister_div(struct clk_hw *hw)
-{
-	struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *div_hw = to_bm1880_div_clk(hw);
-
-	clk_hw_unregister(hw);
-	kfree(div_hw);
-}
-
 static int bm1880_clk_register_divs(struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *clks,
 				    int num_clks,
 				    struct bm1880_clock_data *data)
@@ -729,7 +713,7 @@ static int bm1880_clk_register_divs(struct bm1880_div_hw_clock *clks,
 
 err_clk:
 	while (i--)
-		bm1880_clk_unregister_div(data->hw_data.hws[clks[i].div.id]);
+		clk_hw_unregister(data->hw_data.hws[clks[i].div.id]);
 
 	return PTR_ERR(hw);
 }
-- 
2.30.2