[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211227174954.1411a643@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 17:49:54 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joseph CHAMG <josright123@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, joseph_chang@...icom.com.tw,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9, 2/2] net: Add dm9051 driver
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 18:02:33 +0800 Joseph CHAMG wrote:
> +static inline void dm9051_phyup_lock(struct board_info *db)
> +{
> + int val, ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&db->addr_lock);
> +
> + ret = dm9051_phy_read(db, MII_BMCR, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + /* BMCR Power-up PHY */
> + ret = dm9051_phy_write(db, MII_BMCR, val & ~0x0800);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + /* GPR Power-up PHY */
> + dm9051_iow(db, DM9051_GPR, 0);
> + mdelay(1); /* need for activate phyxcer */
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&db->addr_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dm9051_phydown_lock(struct board_info *db)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&db->addr_lock);
> + dm9051_iow(db, DM9051_GPR, 0x01); /* Power-Down PHY */
> + mutex_unlock(&db->addr_lock);
> +}
Please remove the 'inline' qualifier from functions in C sources.
Compiler will know which static functions to inline these days.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists