[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ycwvm5rdqVW4E27y@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 10:51:23 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@...el.com, Albert Wang <albertccwang@...gle.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: re-initialize the HC during resume if HCE was set
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 05:11:47PM +0800, Puma Hsu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:30 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
> > Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> > A: Top-posting.
> > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> >
> > A: No.
> > Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
> >
> > http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 01:53:04PM +0800, Puma Hsu wrote:
> > > This commit is not used to fix a specific commit. We find a condition
> > > that when XHCI runs the resume process but the HCE flag is set, then
> > > the Run/Stop bit of USBCMD cannot be set so that HC would not be
> > > enabled. In fact, HC may already meet a problem at this moment.
> > > Besides, in xHCI requirements specification revision 1.2, Table 5-21
> > > BIT(12) claims that Software should re-initialize the xHC when HCE is
> > > set. Therefore, I think this commit could be the error handling for
> > > HCE.
> >
> > So this does not actually fix an issue that you have seen in any device
> > or testing? So it is not relevant for older kernels but just "nice to
> > have"?
> >
> > How did you test this if you can not duplicate the problem?
> >
>
> Yes, we actually see that the HCE may be detected while running xhci_resume
> on our product platform, so I'm able to verify this commit can fix
> such a condition.
Given that your product platform is an older kernel version than 5.17, I
think that you also want this in the older kernel releases, so please
mark it for stable backporting.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists