linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: update control for RT5682 series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <164078457646.1246652.7413539172267193137.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:29:36 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     tiwai@...e.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tzungbi@...gle.com, jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com, shumingf@...ltek.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: update control for RT5682 series

On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:48:21 +0800, Trevor Wu wrote:
> Playback pop is observed and the root cause is the reference clock
> provided by MT8195 is diabled before RT5682 finishes the control flow.
> 
> To ensure the reference clock supplied to RT5682 is disabled after RT5682
> finishes all register controls. We replace BCLK with MCLK for RT5682
> reference clock, and makes use of set_bias_level_post to handle MCLK
> which guarantees MCLK is off after all RT5682 register access.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: update control for RT5682 series
      commit: c5ab93e289ce554a4e0d47330dde120284541aa1

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark