linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77961: Add lvds0 device node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YcyXQxW3kRqQ2Yv0@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:13:39 +0200
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77961: Add lvds0 device node

Hi Nikita,

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 08:04:18PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Thank you for looking at this.
> 
> >> +				port@1 {
> >> +					reg = <1>;
> >> +					lvds0_out: endpoint {
> >>   					};
> > 
> > Endpoints must have a remote-endpoint property. Let's drop the endpoint
> > here and keep the port only, the endpoint can be declared in board
> > files.
> > 
> > If you're fine with this change I can make it when applying the patch.
> 
> This empty endpoint is currently defined in dtsi files for other r-car
> gen3 SoCs.
>
> Goal here is to define lvds0_out label that is then used in extension
> board dtsi files to link to the port.
> 
> In this patch I just used the same approach as in files laying nearby.
> 
> If this approach is not appropriate, then perhaps need to fix it in
> files for all SoCs, to make it possible for extension board dtsi to be
> compatible with all of them.

I'm writing a patch to drop those right now :-) I'll CC you.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart