[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39f70781-831e-c86a-ec5f-68f2b4bd3d62@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 20:19:10 +0300
From: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77961: Add lvds0 device node
>> If this approach is not appropriate, then perhaps need to fix it in
>> files for all SoCs, to make it possible for extension board dtsi to be
>> compatible with all of them.
>
> I'm writing a patch to drop those right now :-) I'll CC you.
Ok.
But, are you sure that empty nodes like these are that bad?
I was going to suggest a movement in opposite direction - adding more such nodes, so they could form a
sort of API for dts plugins describing e.g. displays connectable to boards based on different SoCs.
Nikita
Powered by blists - more mailing lists