linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: add docs to packet_format and tx_start

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yc2QrMecuVQFRcBZ@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:57:48 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: add docs to packet_format and
 tx_start_condition enum

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:47:13PM +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> While pi433 driver deals with the nuances of the different possible
> config combinations, it's hard (at first) to understand the rationale
> for some of the tx/rx-related source code unless you're fairly familiar
> with the rf69's inner workings.
> 
> This patch documents the expected behaviour and limits of both
> packet_format and tx_start_condition enum fields.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/pi433/rf69_enum.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69_enum.h b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69_enum.h
> index fbf56fcf5fe8..c902916a063d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69_enum.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/rf69_enum.h
> @@ -109,13 +109,32 @@ enum fifo_fill_condition {
>  	always
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Defines the packet format used.

What "Defines"?  This is an odd sentence.

> + *
> + * In both modes the length of the payload is limited to 255 bytes if AES
> + * is not enabled or 64 bytes otherwise.

What does this have to do with the format type?

> + */
>  enum packet_format {
> +    /*
> +     * Used when the size of payload is fixed in advance. This mode of
> +     * operation may be of interest to minimize RF overhead by 1 byte as
> +     * no length byte field is required
> +     */
>  	packet_length_fix,
> +    /*
> +     * Used when the size of payload isn't known in advance. It requires the
> +     * transmitter to send the length byte in each packet so the receiver
> +     * would know how to operate properly
> +     */
>  	packet_length_var
>  };
>  
> +/* Defines the condition to start packet transmission */
>  enum tx_start_condition {
> +    /* the number of bytes in the FIFO exceeds FIFO_THRESHOLD */
>  	fifo_level,
> +    /* at least one byte in the FIFO */
>  	fifo_not_empty
>  };

Also, always run your patches through scripts/checkpatch.pl before
sending them out.  I couldn't take this patch for that reason alone :(

thanks,

greg k-h