[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yc2QYUcIAV2SY9JU@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 11:56:33 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
Cc: realwakka@...il.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex
definition
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:56:15AM +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> Checkpatch reports: CHECK: struct mutex definition without comment.
> Fix this by documenting what rx_mutex struct is used for in pi433 driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
> ---
> v2: ellaborate on reasons why the mutex lock is used in the driver (Req: Greg k-h)
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211222093626.GA13332@localhost.localdomain/
> ---
> drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> index 29bd37669059..1cd3d5f2df2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,17 @@ struct pi433_device {
> u32 rx_bytes_to_drop;
> u32 rx_bytes_dropped;
> unsigned int rx_position;
> + /*
> + * rx_lock is used to avoid race-conditions that can be triggered from userspace.
> + *
> + * For instance, if a program in userspace is reading the char device
> + * allocated in this module then another program won't be able to change RX
> + * configuration of the RF69 hardware module via ioctl and vice versa.
> + *
> + * utilization summary:
> + * - pi433_read: blocks are read until rx read something (up to the buffer size)
> + * - pi433_ioctl: during pending read request, change of config not allowed
> + */
This is nice, but way too specific, and will quickly get out-of-date.
How about something simple like:
/* Protects all rx_* variable accesses */
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists