[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211230145621.GA3236@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 03:56:21 +1300
From: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: realwakka@...il.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: pi433: add comment to rx_lock mutex
definition
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 11:56:33AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:56:15AM +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * rx_lock is used to avoid race-conditions that can be triggered from userspace.
> > + *
> > + * For instance, if a program in userspace is reading the char device
> > + * allocated in this module then another program won't be able to change RX
> > + * configuration of the RF69 hardware module via ioctl and vice versa.
> > + *
> > + * utilization summary:
> > + * - pi433_read: blocks are read until rx read something (up to the buffer size)
> > + * - pi433_ioctl: during pending read request, change of config not allowed
> > + */
>
> This is nice, but way too specific, and will quickly get out-of-date.
>
> How about something simple like:
> /* Protects all rx_* variable accesses */
>
I see your point. I will send a new version of this patch with your
sugestion. Thanks for guidance.
thanks,
Paulo A.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists