[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5543bdad-3518-fe20-d755-69ebac4ddd69@somainline.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 15:29:54 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8994: Remove NoC clocks
> You don't have to init array entries with NULL values (if it's not for
> the documentation purposes). Uninitialized entries will get NULL value
> anyway.
>
Forgot to address this in my previous message, but I think it may be a
good indicator for the next person that decides this would be a good idea
that they should probably stay away from it.. If it's really bad, then sure, I
can remove it..
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists