[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpq_T0tR=zN8G43otsWEqgkfqV0egrAtfG-VJMib6ZtEHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 17:42:29 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8994: Remove NoC clocks
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 17:29, Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org> wrote:
>
>
> > You don't have to init array entries with NULL values (if it's not for
> > the documentation purposes). Uninitialized entries will get NULL value
> > anyway.
> >
> Forgot to address this in my previous message, but I think it may be a
>
> good indicator for the next person that decides this would be a good idea
>
> that they should probably stay away from it.. If it's really bad, then sure, I
>
> can remove it..
You can add a comment on top of those assignments telling this, so
that the next person doing the semi-auto cleanup wouldn't delete the
assignments.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists